You've Got Questions? I Have Answers

Education In America

Subscribe to Education In America: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts newslettersWeekly Newsletters
Get Education In America: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn


Education In America Authors: Darrah Deal, Student Lance, David Miller, David Miller, Chris Pentago

Article

To Whom It May Concern

LinuxWorld Magazine joins with responsible leaders of the Open Source community in calling for a halt to any DDoS attacks vs SCO

U R G E N T    A P P E A L

Distributed Denial of Service Attacks against SCO, or anyone for that matter, are a clearly unacceptable activity. While many in the Open Source community are not pleased with SCO's lawsuit against IBM, or their proposed legal challenges aimed at Linux users, these DDoS attacks do not promote the Open Source cause, and are not consistent with Open Source values. The Open Source community is based on the notion that principals of free speech should be applied to software development. DDoS attacks clearly deny the victim the ability to communicate freely on the internet. The fact that someone, or some group disagrees with the policies and/or practices of another person or group does not justify this type of attack. We strongly urge whoever is responsible to stop the attack immediately.

More Stories By Steven Berkowitz

Steven Berkowitz, LWM's industry news editor, has done development and project
management for Fortune 100 companies, start-ups, and non-profit organizations.
He currently provides technical and communications consulting services to corporate clients.

More Stories By Mark R. Hinkle

Mark Hinkle is the Senior Director, Open Soure Solutions at Citrix. He also is along-time open source expert and advocate. He is a co-founder of both the Open Source Management Consortium and the Desktop Linux Consortium. He has served as Editor-in-Chief for both LinuxWorld Magazine and Enterprise Open Source Magazine. Hinkle is also the author of the book, "Windows to Linux Business Desktop Migration" (Thomson, 2006). His blog on open source, technology, and new media can be found at http://www.socializedsoftware.com.

More Stories By Kevin Bedell

Kevin Bedell, one of the founding editors of Linux.SYS-CON.com, writes and speaks frequently on Linux and open source. He is the director of consulting and training for Black Duck Software.

More Stories By Dee-Ann LeBlanc

Dee-Ann LeBlanc has been involved with Linux since 1994. She is the author of 12 books, 130 articles, and has more of both coming. She is a trainer, a course developer - including the official Red Hat online courseware at DigitalThink - a founding member of the AnswerSquad, and a consultant.

More Stories By Dan Bent

Dan Bent, Linux.SYS-CON.com's health care and biotechnology editor, has been a network and operating systems consultant since 1989, including active participation in a leadership role in national organizations. In 1994, Dan joined Benefit Systems, Inc., a third-party administrator of employee benefits, as chief information officer. At Benefit Systems he designed and manages a heterogeneous network that includes Unix, Windows, NetWare, and open source elements in support of corporate objectives. In addition, Dan shares his expertise in using current technologies in the business support of hospitals, insurance companies, and other businesses, primarily in industries related to health care.

More Stories By Steve Suehring

Steve Suehring is a technology architect and engineer with a solid background in many areas of computing encompassing both open and closed source systems, he has worked with a variety of companies from small to large, including new and old economy, to help them integrate systems and provide the best use of available technologies. He has also taken a hands-on approach with many projects and frequently leads teams of engineers and developers, and has written magazine articles as well as a book on the MySQL database server. He has also performed technical editing on a number of other titles.

More Stories By Martin C. Brown

Martin C. Brown is a former IT director with experience in cross-platform integration. A keen developer, he has produced dynamic sites for blue-chip customers, including HP and Oracle, and is the technical director of Foodware.net. Now a freelance writer and consultant, MC, as he is better known, works closely with Microsoft as an SME; has a regular column on both ServerWatch.com and IBM's DeveloperWorks Grid Computing site; is a core member of the AnswerSquad.com team; and has written books such as XML Processing with Perl, Python and PHP, and the Microsoft IIS 6 Delta Guide.

More Stories By Pawel Leszek

Pawel Leszek, a contributing editor of Linux.SYS-CON.com, has been a Linux administrator and consultant since 1996. He currently provides consulting expertise in the areas of corporate groupware software and Mac OS X and Linux.

Comments (5) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Jim 12/11/03 05:17:17 PM EST

It is clear the Linux World editors are taking a responsible position in condemning any denial of service attacks.

Dan Bent 12/11/03 12:40:05 PM EST

I can see where Sebastian, and other readers might infer more from our statement than what we intended. Our goal in making any statement at all was to advocte fair play as IngTSx comments. Regrettably, we expressed our opinion about the ethics of DDoS attacks, before we evaluated the possibility of inaccurate statements from SCO. In retrospect, this seems like a blatantly obvious oversight. We apologize for this oversight, and urge our readers to read the articles we, and others, have published which clearly outline solid reasons to be very skeptical of SCO's claims.

Nick B 12/11/03 08:59:39 AM EST

Do you have any evidence that there was an attack? If so, please provide it. (I hope I don't need to remind you that "SCO said so" doesn't count as evidence, these days).

IngTSx 12/11/03 06:04:36 AM EST

It's nice to see the LinuxWorld editors advocating fair play and not using vigilante justice

Sebastian Potter 12/11/03 03:30:45 AM EST

I have to admit that I am utterly dismayed by your characterisation of your own readership as the sort of people that would engage in the nefarious practice of attacking the servers of SCO. I am even more puzzled that you would give SCO's public claims any credence at all.

Given your positions as supposed experts on all things Linux (your own self-proclaimed expertise being implicit in your publication's title), it is astonishing that you would take SCO's claim at face value, apparently without even the most cursory of investigation.

As a security professional myself, and having actually taken some time to weigh the evidence of SCO's claims, I can find absolutely evidence that supports their claims. There is a rather excellent summary of the situation available on the Groklaw web site, here: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031210163721614

Your blatant juxtaposition of the justifiably aggrieved members of the open source community, and the kind of people that might undertake a denial of service attack in your "urgent appeal" leave the reader with the very misleading impression that the open source community is responsible. Your publication's position within this community only serves to provide an apprent admission of guilt (or at least, knowledge of such).

Surely you can appreciate, that with Linux coming under attack from SCO, that your apparent subservience to SCO's press department is only providing further ammunition? Regardless of the complete lack of merit that these accusations hold, the Open Source community still has to expend time and effort to prove the facts of the situation.

I would be extremely interested to hear from you as to your position on this matter.

Yours faithfully,

Sebastian Potter.